• Home
  • Exit programmes
    • Exit programmes in prison >
      • Islamist >
        • In Europe
        • In other regions
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
    • Exit programmes in probation >
      • Islamist
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
    • Exit programmes in prison and probation >
      • Islamist
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
  • Resources
    • ​Radicalisation & Terrorism
    • Disengagement & Deradicalisation
    • Reintegration & Rehabilitation
    • Security
  • What Works
    • Methodological Conceptualisation
    • Evaluation Framework
    • Peer Review Evaluation
  • Contact
Exit Practices
  • Home
  • Exit programmes
    • Exit programmes in prison >
      • Islamist >
        • In Europe
        • In other regions
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
    • Exit programmes in probation >
      • Islamist
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
    • Exit programmes in prison and probation >
      • Islamist
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
  • Resources
    • ​Radicalisation & Terrorism
    • Disengagement & Deradicalisation
    • Reintegration & Rehabilitation
    • Security
  • What Works
    • Methodological Conceptualisation
    • Evaluation Framework
    • Peer Review Evaluation
  • Contact

Security

  • Assessing Risk of Violence Using Structured Professional Judgment Guidelines (Guy, Packer & Warnken, 2012)
  • Convention for the Prevention and Repression of Terrorism (League of Nations Convention, 1937)
  • Countering Violent Extremism: The Application of Risk Assessment Tools in the Criminal Justice and Rehabilitation Process (RTI International, 2018)
  • Development of the RADAR-iTE instruction card for operational and educational purposes (Itälunni, 2018)
  • Data Collection Methods - Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups (RAND National Defense Research Institute, 2009)
  • EU Security Union Strategy 2020-2025 (European Commission, 2020)
  • Evaluation of a Model of Violence Risk Assessment Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients (Douglas, Ogloff & Heart, 2003)
  • Formulation of Violence Risk Using Evidence-Based Assessments: The Structured Professional Judgment Approach (Hart & Logan, 2011)​
  • Handbook on Dynamic Security and Prison Intelligence (UNODC, 2015)
  • Interaction of different subjects Towards A strategic Common Answer concerning juvenile gangs (ITACA, 2013)
  • Multi-agency cooperation (Radicalisation Awareness Network, Prison and Probation Working Group, 2016)
  • Operationalizing the Assessment and Management of Violence Risk in the Short-term (Doyle & Logan, 2012)​​
  • Religion in Prisons - A 50-State Survey of Prison Chaplains (Boddie & Funk, 2012)
  • Risk analysis: An integrated approach to the assessment and management of aggression/violence in mental health (Lamont & Brunero, 2009)
  • Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20 (De Vogel & De Ruiter, 2006)​
  • ​The Canadian Contribution to Violence Risk Assessment: History and Implications for Current Psychiatric Practice (Bloom, Webster, Hucker & De Freitas, 2005)
  • The Clinical Threat Assessment of the Lone-Actor Terrorist (Meloy & Genzman, 2016)
  • The development of structured guidelines for assessing risk in extremist offenders (Lloyd & Dean, 2015)
  • The European Agenda on Security (European Commission, 2015)
  • The management of violence in general psychiatry (Davison, 2005)
  • The Operational Development and Empirical Testing of the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP–18) (Meloy, 2018)
  • The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (UNODC, 2015)
  • Use of Structured Professional Judgment by Probation Officers to Assess Risk for Recidivism in Adolescent Offenders (Lawing, Childs, Frick & Vincent, 2017)
  • Violence risk assessment: combining actuarial and clinical information to structure clinical judgements for the formulation and management of risk (Doyle & Dolan, 2002)
  • Violence risk assessment: Science and practice (Douglas, Cox & Webster, 1999)
  • What can we learn from adjacent phenomena? (RAN, 2018)
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Exit programmes
    • Exit programmes in prison >
      • Islamist >
        • In Europe
        • In other regions
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
    • Exit programmes in probation >
      • Islamist
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
    • Exit programmes in prison and probation >
      • Islamist
      • Far-Right
      • Far-Left
  • Resources
    • ​Radicalisation & Terrorism
    • Disengagement & Deradicalisation
    • Reintegration & Rehabilitation
    • Security
  • What Works
    • Methodological Conceptualisation
    • Evaluation Framework
    • Peer Review Evaluation
  • Contact